Those who call the Electoral College “undemocratic” often claim it represents the Founders’ fear of an imprudent electorate whose choice for president is best confirmed by wise and dispassionate electors. Its winner-takes-all approach cancels the votes of the losing candidates in each state.It permits the election of a candidate who does not win the most votes and.Three criticisms of the College are made: It is timely to consider the value of this vital and controversial institution devised by our founders in 1787 in the world's oldest constitution. Today, all but two states award all of their electoral votes to the statewide winner. Ever since Andrew Jackson was denied the presidency by the House of Representatives in 1824, some have called for its abolition. President Andrew Jackson, December 8, 1829, first Annual Message to CongressĪmericans elect a president through the state-by-state mechanism of the Electoral College rather than direct nationwide popular vote. "To the people belongs the right of electing their Chief Magistrate it was never designed that their choice should in any case be defeated, either by the intervention of Electoral College or by. All 537 of those elected to national offices - the President, Vice President, 100 Senators, and 435 Representatives - are chosen by majorities that reflect the Nation's federal nature." "America's Constitutional system aims not merely for majority rule, but rule by certain kinds of majorities.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |